Peer Review

The peer review was very hectic at first. I didn’t really know anyone’s name but I soon figured that out I got to peer reviewing. I handed my video to the group that was peer reviewing us and I got the video from the other group. Now that I had their video I really wanted to give them constructive criticism and help them with their video. While watching the video with my teammates we were able to have a lot of eyes on the video and could make proper criticism. The first questions were talking about the semantics of the video. It needed to reach a certain time and have certain titles in specific order. From what we watched, it seemed decent and even though they didn't have everything perfect they still did a good job. Luckily we were able to give them the criticism they needed to fix those issues. Moving on to the lighting. There lighting was decent but some parts were a little bit dark. I told them how to fix that issue and I hope they listened to that.  Their sound quality was also decent but some parts weren't that good and were inaudible at some parts. It was hard to focus on the audio with all the background noise. They did avoid any clips of them laughing and or any indication of someone holding the camera. When it came to the different shots they had about 8/14 of what they needed to have. I really liked he plot of the movie. I twas easy to understand and seemed familiar but had a different take. I would suggest they try out different shots. It would make the film more engaging and creative-looking.